I made a trust relation graph of all keys of the keysigning party. (Well technically, only those keys who signed my key, but since I finished the round, everyone should be on it. Though that's not the case, because not everyone has sent me their signature yet). You can find the picture here: http://aphexer.ulyssis.org/fosdem2007/fosdem_keysigning.jpg Alex
Alexander Prinsier wrote:
(Well technically, only those keys who signed my key, but since I finished the round, everyone should be on it. Though that's not the case, because not everyone has sent me their signature yet).
If anyone could provide me with a list of all gpg key id's (or just a gpg keyring would suffice) that were on the list I could probably make a more interesting graph where really everyone was on. Perhaps the key signing party organizer has such a keyring?:) Alex
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:49:23AM +0100, Alexander Prinsier wrote:
If anyone could provide me with a list of all gpg key id's (or just a gpg keyring would suffice) that were on the list I could probably make a more interesting graph where really everyone was on.
Perhaps the key signing party organizer has such a keyring?:)
I might :) http://www.grep.be/~wouter/importring.gpg (3MB) -- <Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes. -- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22
At Thu, 01 Mar 2007 08:46:14 +0100, Alexander Prinsier wrote:
I made a trust relation graph of all keys of the keysigning party.
(Well technically, only those keys who signed my key, but since I finished the round, everyone should be on it. Though that's not the case, because not everyone has sent me their signature yet).
You can find the picture here: http://aphexer.ulyssis.org/fosdem2007/fosdem_keysigning.jpg
It would look a lot better if you created a png instead of a jpeg. You should only use jpeg for photos. Jeroen Dekkers
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Perhaps the key signing party organizer has such a keyring?:)
I might :)
Thank you :) Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
It would look a lot better if you created a png instead of a jpeg. You should only use jpeg for photos.
Thanks, it does indeed look better in png :) The updated file is here: http://aphexer.ulyssis.org/fosdem2007/fosdem_keysigning2.png The colorcode is like this: blue if you signed alot of keys, but other don't sign your key red if others signed your key, but you didn't sign much keys green when your ratio is 1. Because of some bug somewhere people who are fully blue appear black on the picture... Sorry for those people :) Alex
* Alexander Prinsier <fosdem@aphexer.mailhaven.com> wrote:
The updated file is here: http://aphexer.ulyssis.org/fosdem2007/fosdem_keysigning2.png
The colorcode is like this: blue if you signed alot of keys, but other don't sign your key red if others signed your key, but you didn't sign much keys green when your ratio is 1.
Hm, what exactly is ratio 1? I couldn't make it to FOSDEM, yet I find myself on this trust relation graph... Why don't you use only the key IDs of attendees? I know it's easier to just grab the keyring of all submitters to play with the fancy stuff, but IMBO this is a bad choice. Either use a keyring of attendees or explicitly state in the pic that this is a map of based on submitters key IDs. And most importantly... be patient. I think it's far too soon to create such a map. To summarize my experiences from previous events, it is quite usual that signatures are exchanged weeks (months, literally) after the event, and some lazy bones take even half a year to do so. So please point out the snapshot nature of your efforts. -- left blank, right bald
* Alexander Prinsier <fosdem@aphexer.mailhaven.com> wrote:
The updated file is here: http://aphexer.ulyssis.org/fosdem2007/fosdem_keysigning2.png
The colorcode is like this: blue if you signed alot of keys, but other don't sign your key red if others signed your key, but you didn't sign much keys green when your ratio is 1.
Hm, what exactly is ratio 1? When you signed as many keys as other people signed your key. I'm not sure if the meaning of the color has a use. But it's looks pretier than all grey :)
I couldn't make it to FOSDEM, yet I find myself on this trust relation graph... Why don't you use only the key IDs of attendees? Because it's too much manual work to only select those that were really
markus reichelt wrote: present.
I know it's easier to just grab the keyring of all submitters to play with the fancy stuff, but IMBO this is a bad choice. Either use a keyring of attendees or explicitly state in the pic that this is a map of based on submitters key IDs.
I probably should mention that somewhere yes.
And most importantly... be patient. I think it's far too soon to create such a map. To summarize my experiences from previous events, it is quite usual that signatures are exchanged weeks (months, literally) after the event, and some lazy bones take even half a year to do so.
I received around 70% already, I was just curious how it would look. Wanted to share the pic for the other people who were intersted :) No other intentions:)
So please point out the snapshot nature of your efforts.
Hope that's clear now :) Alex
participants (4)
-
Alexander Prinsier -
Jeroen Dekkers -
markus reichelt -
Wouter Verhelst