On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Philip Paeps <philip@fosdem.org> wrote:
On 2012-02-10 15:37:46 (+0100), Benjamin Henrion <bh@udev.org> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:31 AM, Philip Paeps <philip@fosdem.org> wrote:
On 2012-02-10 02:22:28 (+0100), Raffaele Recalcati <lamiaposta71@gmail.com> wrote:
As I believe in this conference growing years-by-years I'm convinced that a proper presentation archive is needed.
We've had a presentation archive for ages. If it's not proper, we need to fix that. Currently, we just link the presentations to the schedule. That seems to be a natural fit.
Obviously we need the collection of presentation and a good storage to put it. In order to solve the first item I guess an announcement on these and other ml like this "Hey 2012 speaker, can you please send us your presentation? We'll put it on the website".
We just email speakers directly and ask them for their presentations at the
The flaw in there is that you are only taking care of the "main tracks".
Did you miss some emails? We're obviously doing the devrooms too. We just didn't email them to submit their slides yet.
Setting up an email address "slides@fosdem.org" would be helpful for next edition.
No. That would be a catastrophically stupid regression.
Main track speakers and devroom coordinators can just upload their slides to
Just give all speakers a login on pentabarf, devroom coordinators have other things to do as well. Getting rid of email is a good thing. -- Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org> FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or democratically elected legislators."