On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 09:41:55AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 11/01/2022 09:21, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
You have made your point. The FOSDEM team disagrees with you. The code of conduct is not going to go away, and you are expected to abide by it.
Please don't change what was already written
The original message: "Is it a good moment to contemplate the relationship between Academic Freedom and CoCs?"
Nobody asked to remove the CoC.
Can you please comment on why Olav's reply didn't appear immediately to other participants on the list and how that led another Debian Developer, Geert, to accuse me of forwarding a private message onto the list?
Geert Stappers Assumes the Olav Vitters posting was a private request, unhappy to seen an onlist reply of it ...
We saw this in a previous year when messages about Google were not appearing on the FOSDEM list:
https://lists.fosdem.org/pipermail/fosdem/2021q1/003193.html
Have other messages with comments about academic liberty been lost?
Regards,
Daniel
Headers from the Olav Vitters email: |Received: from mail.fosdem.org (mail.fosdem.org [31.22.22.142]) | by gpm.stappers.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64FF23041A6 | for <stappers@stappers.nl>; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:36:11 +0100 (CET) |Received: from mail.fosdem.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) | by mail.fosdem.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402D2BB543; | Mon, 10 Jan 2022 23:35:58 +0000 (UTC) |Received: from mail-ua1-x934.google.com (mail-ua1-x934.google.com | [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::934]) | (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) | (No client certificate requested) | by mail.fosdem.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 098D0BB72A | for <fosdem@lists.fosdem.org>; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:56:40 +0000 (UTC) |Received: by mail-ua1-x934.google.com with SMTP id l15so13473798uai.11 | for <fosdem@lists.fosdem.org>; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 09:56:40 -0800 (PST) I do read that as "email had to wait for approval". My previous email in this thread: | On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 07:47:41PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: | > On 10/01/2022 18:56, Olav Vitters wrote: | > > Hardly anyone responded to this. Yet the emails continue. | > > Could this please stop? | | +1 | | | Regards | Geert Stappers | Assumes the Olav Vitters posting was a private request, | unhappy to seen an onlist reply of it ... | -- | Silence is hard to parse The message is and was "Could this please stop?" Regards Geert Stappers Shouldn't have to try to put out fire with gasoline. -- Silence is hard to parse