* Dag Wieers <dag@wieers.com> wrote:
And next year discuss the keysigning on a dedicated mailinglist instead ?
And a good exmaple for what is not constructive.
Maybe not immediately constructive for fixing the KSP problems, but it is constructive for (some of) the users of this list. I provide a solution for something that is (not only) bothering me.
If the KSP people can use this mailinglist to question the location and organisation of the KSP. Why can I not use the mailinglist to propose splitting the organisation of the KSP to a seperate mailinglist ?
Without being called unconstructive.
Simply looking at the archive:
http://lists.fosdem.org/pipermail/fosdem/2009-February/thread.html
about 60% of the mails to this mailinglist were related to the KSP. If you include January too, it is likely even more.
Would you please stop driving this issue? It's not important how many mails on this list are related to a certain topic of FOSDEM. It's still related to FOSDEM and as such on-topic. What if next year a different topic with a large percentage of mails in January f.e. comes up? Do yo want a separate mailinglist for it then as well? We surely can help generate traffic next year, mind you, like voting on talks after the conference, slides/PDFs not being available beforehand, just to name a few out of the blue. Wound, Salt, Temptation. One Doesn't Want This. If one doesn't like an on-topic matter being discussed on a mailinglist then please use a MUA that supports scoring in case one is driven by the urge to read each and every mail on this list. Just for the record: Nobody forces one to read mails with a subject one dislikes already. That being said, I rest my case. Have fun! -- left blank, right bald