On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Richard Hartmann wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2009 at 17:41, Dag Wieers <dag@wieers.com> wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, David "Lefty" Schlesinger wrote:
And next year discuss the keysigning on a dedicated mailinglist instead ?
And a good exmaple for what is not constructive.
Maybe not immediately constructive for fixing the KSP problems, but it is constructive for (some of) the users of this list. I provide a solution for something that is (not only) bothering me. If the KSP people can use this mailinglist to question the location and organisation of the KSP. Why can I not use the mailinglist to propose splitting the organisation of the KSP to a seperate mailinglist ? Without being called unconstructive. Simply looking at the archive: http://lists.fosdem.org/pipermail/fosdem/2009-February/thread.html about 60% of the mails to this mailinglist were related to the KSP. If you include January too, it is likely even more. -- -- dag wieers, dag@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]