[FOSDEM] Re: Key Signing Party -> Saturday Evening

Dag Wieers dag at wieers.com
Tue Feb 17 17:47:12 CET 2009


On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Richard Hartmann wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 17, 2009 at 17:41, Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, David "Lefty" Schlesinger wrote:
>
>> And next year discuss the keysigning on a dedicated mailinglist instead ?
>
> And a good exmaple for what is not constructive.

Maybe not immediately constructive for fixing the KSP problems, but it is 
constructive for (some of) the users of this list. I provide a solution 
for something that is (not only) bothering me.

If the KSP people can use this mailinglist to question the location and 
organisation of the KSP. Why can I not use the mailinglist to propose 
splitting the organisation of the KSP to a seperate mailinglist ?

Without being called unconstructive.


Simply looking at the archive:

 	http://lists.fosdem.org/pipermail/fosdem/2009-February/thread.html

about 60% of the mails to this mailinglist were related to the KSP. If you 
include January too, it is likely even more.

-- 
--   dag wieers,  dag at wieers.com,  http://dag.wieers.com/   --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]



More information about the FOSDEM mailing list